Understanding the Optimal Stopping Problem

The optimal stopping problem—also known as the secretary problem or the 37 percent rule—addresses a fundamental challenge: how to select the best option from a sequence of candidates when you cannot revisit earlier choices. In dating, this translates to a concrete dilemma: if you meet ten potential partners over your lifetime, which one should you choose?

The mathematics reveals a counterintuitive answer. You should not immediately select the first attractive person you meet. Instead, you should date a set number of people purely to understand the dating pool, then commit to the next person who surpasses everyone you've encountered so far. Research by experimental psychologists including J. Neil Bearden and Amnon Rapoport has shown that people naturally reject this strategy and settle too quickly, missing objectively better matches later on.

Calculating Your Dating Sample Size

The core formula determines how many potential partners you should evaluate before applying your selection rule. This depends on your dating frequency and the timeframe you're willing to invest.

Total candidates = Dating frequency × Time period

  • Dating frequency — Number of dates per unit time (e.g., dates per year)
  • Time period — Length of your dating window in the same units
  • Total candidates — Total number of potential partners you'll encounter

The 37 Percent Rule and Success Rates

Once you know your total dating pool, multiply by 0.37 to find your evaluation threshold. If you'll date 100 people, evaluate the first 37 and then commit to the next person who exceeds that entire group. This strategy maximizes your probability of selecting the best partner from your available pool.

However, success isn't guaranteed. The optimal stopping strategy has inherent risks. If your ideal partner appears within your evaluation phase, you'll necessarily reject them according to the rule. You then continue meeting people, but nobody matches that earlier standard. You may end up having to reject everyone else and finish alone. The trade-off is that this algorithm gives you the best mathematical odds of securing an excellent partner—roughly 37 percent success rate—compared to random selection or other intuitive approaches.

Real-World Adjustments and Rejection Probability

The pure optimal stopping model assumes you'll succeed with anyone you choose. Reality is messier. Your prospective partner might reject you, or mutual attraction might not develop. This calculator incorporates a rejection probability to reflect that becoming a couple requires agreement from both parties.

Additionally, you don't necessarily need to find the absolute best match. If you'd be satisfied with your top 5 or top 10 candidate instead of settling for nothing, your success rate improves significantly. Specifying this threshold in the calculator adjusts both the rejection percentage and your probability of ending with a partner. These real-world variations make the tool more applicable to actual dating decisions rather than abstract mathematics.

Common Pitfalls in Dating Strategy

Applying optimal stopping theory to your love life requires honest self-assessment and realistic expectations.

  1. Underestimating your dating pool — Many people either vastly underestimate how many potential partners they'll meet or overestimate how long they're willing to date. Be conservative with your time horizon and dating frequency estimates. A miscalculation here throws off your entire evaluation threshold and can lead to either rejecting too many people or committing too early.
  2. Confusing 'better than all previous' with 'perfect' — The strategy doesn't guarantee you'll find your soulmate. It identifies the first person who beats your sample group, not someone objectively perfect. You might pass on someone decent during evaluation phase expecting to find someone extraordinary later, then face disappointment.
  3. Ignoring mutual selection — The model assumes if you choose someone, they'll choose you back. Real dating requires reciprocal interest and effort. A high rejection probability significantly lowers your success rate, so factor in honestly whether your target matches would likely accept a relationship with you.
  4. Forgetting this is probabilistic — Even with optimal strategy, you have roughly 37 percent odds of success. That's better than random choice, but it's still a coin flip with worse odds. Don't interpret the calculator's recommendation as a guarantee or become frustrated if the outcome doesn't match the theory.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the optimal stopping strategy apply to modern dating?

The optimal stopping model suggests dating a set percentage of potential partners to calibrate your standards, then committing to the first person who exceeds that entire sample. In practice, this means if you estimate meeting 50 potential partners, you'd evaluate roughly the first 19 with an open but non-committal mindset, then pursue a relationship with the next person who genuinely surpasses them. This framework helps prevent both premature commitment and endless searching.

Why is 37 percent the magic number?

The 37 percent threshold emerges from the mathematics of maximizing your chances. When you reject the first 37 percent of candidates and then select the next one who beats them all, you optimize the probability of choosing the overall best option. This balance between gathering enough information and acting decisively before running out of candidates produces the highest success rate. The number holds regardless of pool size, making it surprisingly robust across different dating timelines.

What happens if my ideal partner appears during my evaluation phase?

If the best match arrives before your evaluation threshold, you'll necessarily reject them per the strategy. You'll then continue dating but find nobody equals that earlier standard. This is the algorithm's fatal flaw: it sometimes produces loneliness rather than partnership. The trade-off is that following the rule gives you better overall odds of success across many dating attempts. Deviating to pursue someone early might feel right emotionally but lowers your expected long-term outcome.

Does rejection probability change my strategy?

Yes. When you factor in that potential partners might decline a relationship with you, your optimal rejection percentage shifts. Higher rejection probability means you should be less selective, moving your commitment threshold lower. If only half of people you approach would reciprocate, you can't afford to wait for someone who barely exceeds your sample. The calculator adjusts your strategy dynamically based on this realistic constraint.

Can I modify the strategy if I don't want to find the absolute best match?

Absolutely. If you'd be content with someone in your top 5 or top 10 rather than demanding the single best option, your success rate jumps substantially. You become less picky during selection, which increases the probability that someone meeting your adjusted criteria will actually say yes and commit. This is often more practical psychologically and mathematically produces better real-world outcomes than holding out for perfection.

Is there scientific evidence that this strategy works?

Experimental psychologists have tested optimal stopping behavior in controlled settings. Subjects offered financial rewards for selecting top candidates from pools of 40 or 80 typically underperformed the mathematical optimum, rejecting too few candidates. However, the theory itself is mathematically sound and has been proven across abstract problems. Real dating adds complexities like mutual choice and subjective compatibility that math alone can't capture, so treat the calculator as a decision framework rather than a guarantee.

More other calculators (see all)